Best in 1080p
We are the High Overlords and welcome to our province. No soliciting. Now return From Whence You Came...
Thursday, 23 April 2015
Wednesday, 22 April 2015
Evaluation Question 7
7 Looking back at your preliminary
task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full
product?
Our preliminary exercise was a task to help
improve our use of continuity. This involved filming and editing a character
opening a door, crossing a room and sitting down in a chair opposite another
character, with whom she/he then exchanges a couple of lines of dialogue. This
task should demonstrate match on action, shot/reverse shot and the 180-degree
rule.
When we started on this, we were new to
college and hardly knew anyone. Me and Kyle both knew each other from previous
forms of education, but Ross was a person who we had only met in college and as
such we didn't know each other. This exercise not only served as a way to
improve continuity, it was also for developing our team working skills. As none
of us had taken a media course before this, we were all lacking experience. The
preliminary task also gave us experience and prepared us for the two minute
film; such as how to write a script.
While learning about the new rules and
shots, we were also learning about the equipment and software that we would
use. It served as way to learn on how to improve for the next thing that we
were to do. An example of this would be when opening doors. We had to retake
the shot because the actor opened the door differently in shots; with the
handle and with his hand in the next. We also learned how to fix the mistakes
from filming in editing, by covering it up with cuts and such.
I'd say that the thing we took the most
from the preliminary exercise was to be a perfectionist, as editing is much
harder without good footage. We did this by retaking some shots multiple times
to make sure that it would be perfect. For example, in the montage we retook
the shot of me taking the hat off of the table multiple times (probably around
ten in total). Even though I found that to be quite tedious, I believe that it
was worth it. Although we didn't retake all of the shots in the film, most of
them were taken at least twice and we got some really good shots from doing
this.
I think that I have improved with my
filming skills most of all. Before doing this, I had practically no experience
with filming (although I had filmed things before). After completing this I
felt that I knew much more about it; such as how to reposition the camera while
it was still on the tripod and how to change the depth of focus.
From this project I have gained a lot of
experience that I could carry over to other areas or future projects. I have
learnt a lot of things that have a variety of uses, such as which angle would
be the best for a shot. This means that filming wouldn't be as hard as I would
know what would be the best option for what I'm doing. I'm satisfied with the
end project, but there are a few scenes which could've been redone.
Tuesday, 21 April 2015
Evaluation Question 6
6 What have
you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
What have I learnt?

Although I had done some filming before I
started this project, it was only with a digital camera or something similar.
Now that I finished this project, I would say that I’m used to using more
professional cameras as I can adjust the settings to my taste. I am proficient
at most aspects of it, like transferring the data or changing the focus. This
was also the first time for other programs or websites, like Blogger or Final
Cut. I have never been interested in blogging and I rarely look at the blogs of
other people. Although I haven’t been particularly bad with English skills, I
feel that this has helped me fine tune them. For the editing side, I have even
less experience. The closest that I’ve been to editing before was watching and
helping Kyle edit videos in Sony Vegas Pro 12. Even though these two programs
are clearly different, I feel that I can carry over the experience that I
gained with Final Cut over to other programs and I believe that it has helped
me get used to editing.
What
key decisions did you make during pre-production about technology?
Even before we started thinking about the
plot of our film, we had all wanted it to be a horror film. I used Blogger to
post a simple idea on what the story could be. The three of us then pooled our
ideas together to create the story that we ended up with. The script was then
rewritten using Celtx. Celtx is a program that is used to write up storyboards
in the same way that professionals do. After this, we wrote more posts about
the prop list and shot list needed for the film, amongst other things that we
needed for the film.
What
key decisions did you make during post-production about technology?
Once we had finished recording all the
scenes for the film, we used Final Cut Express to edit the scenes and piece
them together. The internet was used to find sounds and music for our film as
it sounded rather bare without any. Examples of the things that we used would
be ‘Stinger’, the music used during Volnus’ scene and the sound of the ticking
clock used during the montage. However, these along with the edited scenes,
were lost close to when we were about to finish after the Mac we used to edit
the film on broke and the IT technicians didn’t retrieve the lost data. Because
of this we had to re-edit the film in a small amount of time. However, we still
had all the scenes on the tape and we only had to retake one voice clip.
Re-editing the film didn’t take as long as the first time, but it still felt
tedious to do. After finishing the film, we uploaded it to YouTube and linked
it on Blogger.
Technology
during production
The film was captured on a SonyHD1000
camera, which we got as a rental from college. Thanks to this, our footage was
of high quality and as such it looks more like an actual film. The scenes
themselves were edited to change how they look to better match the setting. An
example of this would be for the shots of Volnus. The lighting in the room was
too dark, so we had to adjust the focus so that it set on specific things with
manual focus.
Another thing which we used technology for
during production was a sound recorder. For the parts that were voiceovers, we
couldn't record them as part of the scene so we had record them separately. The
raw recordings of the voices didn't exactly fit with the scenes, even though
they were of high quality, so we had to edit them in Final Cut Express to get
them how we wanted. Even though the voice clips were edited, I think that they
still sound like diegetic sound.
Monday, 20 April 2015
Sunday, 19 April 2015
Evaluation Question 4
Question 4: Who would be the audience for your media product?
Age
For
our film, I’d say that it would be age certificate 15. This is mainly because
of the contents of our film, especially as it is a horror film. According to
British Board of Film Classification (BBFC), a 15 rated film may contain:
As
our film contains no nudity or anything to do with any sexual activities, I
won’t need to factor that into the age rating. 15 rated films are allowed to
have some strong violence, to some extent. This will be good for our film
because we have a murder in the opening and there would most likely be more in
the full film.
Gender
Personally,
I don’t think that gender will have much of a difference with whether the film
will be enjoyed or not. However, I think that males will end up liking the film
more because all of the characters so far are men. This is because they would
end up bonding with the characters more as they can emphasise with them.
Habits/Lifestyle
Our
film is more likely to appeal to adults, as students may not have as much
experience with detective thrillers. However, as a horror movie, it may appeal
to teenagers. Students would be more likely to watch the movie in the cinema,
as cinemas have student discounts among other factors. Adults however may be
inclined to purchase it as a DVD or rent it online. The audience would probably
either be specifically into horror as a genre, or just be looking to be scared
by the film.
Ethnicity
I
believe that people from a wide variety of backgrounds will want to watch our
film. However, I believe that our film would appeal to a mainly white/British
audience, as that is where the characters originate.
Pre-production Research
Before
we had finish filming of the film, we created a questionnaire for an overview
of the film. We handed the questionnaire to several people and filmed their
responses. The questions we asked included things such as “What do you think
this film would be rated?” and other similar questions.How we used it
When
asked about the location, people suggested that it should be in a dark place or
room. We achieved this by getting a large room in college and turning down the
lighting.
Evaluation Question 3
Question 3: What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
Company: Warp Films
•Warp
Films is an English based company that has distributed a wide variety of films;
‘4 Lions’ and ‘This is England’ are the most notable examples.
•I
think that Warp Films would be a good choice for our distributor because they
are known to work with relatively unknown titles; such as ‘Submarine’, there
would be a better chance that they’d work with us.
•Also,
as Warp Films are an English company, it would be better to go to them as their
films are all filmed in the UK and they stay in that area, whereas bigger
companies would go outside the UK and therefore would be difficult to work
with.
•Warp
Films has also worked on a wide variety of genres; such as comedy or horror, so
a film like ours wouldn’t be too different from what they’re used to.
Similar Films Distribution: Scream
•Scream
was distributed by Dimension Films.
•Dimension
Films has worked on a large number of popular movie franchises; such as Spy
Kids, Scary
Movie, Scream and Halloween.
•I
think that Dimension Films would be a good choice for a distributor as they
have distributed a large number that are the same genre as our film; horror.
•However,
unlike Warp Films, Dimension Films is based in America so it would be harder to
reach them. For this reason, I believe that Warp Films would be a better choice
as they are also more likely to choose a lesser known film as a project.
Saturday, 18 April 2015
Evaluation Question 2
2 How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Age
Will and Frank are around the mid twenties
age wise. However, generally in detective films the inspector or similar person
is well season; normally seen as a gruff man in his 40s or older. With this
portrayal of the classic character type, it will attract a new audience to our
film as it appeals to a new age group and the different take will also intrigue
new people. Volnus however never has his age revealed, as he is a mystery.
Although he never has it revealed, people can guess that he’d be the same age as
Will or similar at least.
Gender
As we only produced a small section of the
full film, only the male characters were shown. The only reason why no females
were shown was because the film never got that far. However, as there are no
females as of yet, the film so far would probably appeal to men as they would
be able to relate to the characters more. It may end up alienating female
viewers, which is not what we want.
Social class
Social class isn’t represented that much in
the film, so there isn't really a specific social class that this film could
aim at. However, Volnus is shown to have an accent that makes him seem of a
high social class. This may not matter too much, but it may attract more people
who are of a high social class.
Mise-en-scene
In our film, the costumes that the characters
wear are much more than clothes; they reflect the personalities of the
characters. For example; in the first scene where Will is shown, he is wearing
casual wear. However, later in the film (when he is getting dressed) he wears a
police uniform. This change symbolises his determination to catch Volnus, as a
cop would be able to do it.
Evaluation Question 7
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
Our preliminary task was a continuity task, involving filming and editing a character opening a door, crossing a room and sitting down in a chair opposite another character with whom they would exchange a few lines of dialogue. We were tasked with demonstrating a match on action, shot reverse shot and the 180-degree rule.
At the time of doing this, we had no experience and had to work with new people. I had known Jonathan previously, however we had both only met Ross so this wasn't just developing our media skills but also our team skills and co-operation so that we could work consistently together. It was a bit intimidating being tasked to do this task as none of us had done a media course prior to this and had only just learnt the basics. By doing this, we would be prepared to work on a two minute piece based on a script of our own which would be the opening sequence to a new film. This included the titles and setting the basis of a storyline.
As we learnt these new rules and shots, which were basic and would set us up to learn the rest of the key shots to produce the next piece, we also learnt how to operate the equipment and use the editing software. From making this, we were able to see where we went wrong and could learn from these mistakes. For example, one of us spotted that the shot where we attempted to do a match on action went wrong due to the fact the male actor opened the door with the handle in one shot and then simply opened it with his hand in the next. Due to cutting out certain parts of this shot during the editing stage, this was solved and was helpful to teach us what to do when we went onto the main product. It also taught us that even if we made a mistake during filming, by doing several takes and the use of some sneaky editing cuts we could easily fix it.
So during the preliminary we learnt how to do a Match on action. As previously mentioned, we had a little bit of difficulty when doing this so we took what we had learnt from our mistakes and applied it to all of our filming time. We heavily insisted on doing a shot over and over again and although this took a lot of time I believe it was worth it.
For example, while we were filming the montage, there was a particular shot that I may have gotten a little out of hand with.(Shot above). I near forced my colleagues to retake this shot a total of 7 times just because i felt there should have been more flow to it. In one case, the hat dragged the table cloth with it and off of the table. Looking through all of the shots during editing however, I did the right thing as we were able to find the best quality shot out of a large pool of shots. We did this for near all of the shots we took for our film and I think that is why we were able to take some very good shots.
One thing I personally have improved at is using the Final Cut Express editing software. By doing the preliminary exercise, I wasn't going into editing the film "Blind" and had a little bit of experience in my belt so I didn't have to spend time learning how to do the basics of the software. I definitely used more techniques during editing the film, such as varying how loud the sound was for the radio broadcast, as you can hear it slightly fade out as Will walks out of the door and away from the radio. I have definitely improved at using the software and recording equipment since doing the preliminary task, just with using it more I have found the varying ways they could be used and have found out what they do in more depth.
One method that we used was parallel editing during the scene where Volnus called Will. We showed not only what Volnus was doing at the time, but also showed what was going in around Will at the same time; showing Will typing previous to receiving the call and his reaction to what he could hear going on where Frank and Volnus were. We were able to maximise continuity throughout the film due to our previous experience and could do it with more precision, being able to make the film seamlessly switch from shot to shot, allowing it to flow without the audience noticing.
I have come away from this with more knowledge and experience than I ever could have hoped for and feel I would be able to apply this experience to future projects. I have learnt a lot about which type of shot would best fit certain scenarios and am more accustomed to the creation of a film, from start to finish. This has allowed me to be more confident when editing personal projects and have a knack for knowing if a shot is one or two frames too long or short. I am very happy with our end project and know where we could improve such as shots that are slightly blurry or too quiet. I look forward to more experiences like this where I can learn more and improve my skills.
So during the preliminary we learnt how to do a Match on action. As previously mentioned, we had a little bit of difficulty when doing this so we took what we had learnt from our mistakes and applied it to all of our filming time. We heavily insisted on doing a shot over and over again and although this took a lot of time I believe it was worth it.
For example, while we were filming the montage, there was a particular shot that I may have gotten a little out of hand with.(Shot above). I near forced my colleagues to retake this shot a total of 7 times just because i felt there should have been more flow to it. In one case, the hat dragged the table cloth with it and off of the table. Looking through all of the shots during editing however, I did the right thing as we were able to find the best quality shot out of a large pool of shots. We did this for near all of the shots we took for our film and I think that is why we were able to take some very good shots.
One thing I personally have improved at is using the Final Cut Express editing software. By doing the preliminary exercise, I wasn't going into editing the film "Blind" and had a little bit of experience in my belt so I didn't have to spend time learning how to do the basics of the software. I definitely used more techniques during editing the film, such as varying how loud the sound was for the radio broadcast, as you can hear it slightly fade out as Will walks out of the door and away from the radio. I have definitely improved at using the software and recording equipment since doing the preliminary task, just with using it more I have found the varying ways they could be used and have found out what they do in more depth.
One method that we used was parallel editing during the scene where Volnus called Will. We showed not only what Volnus was doing at the time, but also showed what was going in around Will at the same time; showing Will typing previous to receiving the call and his reaction to what he could hear going on where Frank and Volnus were. We were able to maximise continuity throughout the film due to our previous experience and could do it with more precision, being able to make the film seamlessly switch from shot to shot, allowing it to flow without the audience noticing.
I have come away from this with more knowledge and experience than I ever could have hoped for and feel I would be able to apply this experience to future projects. I have learnt a lot about which type of shot would best fit certain scenarios and am more accustomed to the creation of a film, from start to finish. This has allowed me to be more confident when editing personal projects and have a knack for knowing if a shot is one or two frames too long or short. I am very happy with our end project and know where we could improve such as shots that are slightly blurry or too quiet. I look forward to more experiences like this where I can learn more and improve my skills.
Friday, 17 April 2015
Tuesday, 14 April 2015
Sunday, 12 April 2015
Evaluation - Question 2
http://prezi.com/ttydrftwhuzr/?utm_campaign=share&utm_medium=copy&rc=ex0share
Evaluation - Question 1
In what ways does your media product challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
With Forms and Conventions, we decided not to stray too far from the norm of the generic Horror genre film. One example would be that in a large amount of horrors, such as Saw for example, have the main villain as some form of serial killer with mental issues, and I believe our villan, Volnus, fits this almost perfectly. As with most Hollywood horrors, people watch them to be scared. They go into said films to maybe face their fears, or just for the simple adrenaline rush of being scared to death. With this in mind, Volnus was born.
On the topic of camera angles and shots, we decided to add in a rip of the hat to one of the most well know horrors ever made, Psycho. We did this in the scene that included Volnus and Frank. At the point Frank was about to be stabbed,we used a shot that showed the shadow of the murder rather than just showing the action being carried out. Paired with the low-angle shot just before Volnus kills Frank, we convey the idea that Volnus is the more powerful character and therefore intimidating. Many films of this genre are known to use techniques like this, as it is high impact and can easily make the audience feel intimidated as well, as if they are there in the scene.To make the film seem as realistic as possible to the viewer as well as to us ourselves, we maintained continuity throughout all of the piece. Without maintaining continuity, the film could have come off as a comedy horror, with the continuity errors being interpreted as jokes by the audience. We wanted the full impact of a horror film. We see many examples of match on action throughout the film, such as when Will answers the phone(Around 0:25). We put a large amount of work into the editing, so much so that we tried to convey feelings and the atmosphere through the editing alone at some points. A key example would be after the main title sequence where we see Will, the main protagonist, going through his daily routine. However, the editing is fast paced, switching from one shot to another which connotes franticness of Wills routine, as we know this is caused by what happened to Frank.
I'd say for sound, we tried to stay true to what you would expect from a horror. We frequently use incidental sound throughout to further effect the atmosphere. For example, one of the most important sounds i feel was added was the ticking of the clock during the montage scene. This quiet, melodic ticking got progressively louder throughout. This forced the sense of time into the audiences mind, and further backed up the frantic nature of the scene. It conveyed the lack of time, how time was catching up with Will and he didn't have much left. We matched up the final tick on the clock with the slamming shut of the door, emphasising the importance.
![]() |
| Said unusual clothing |
Mise-en-scene was very important in our film, and i believe we strayed far from the path of conventional slasher films. The room was relatively empty for Volnus' scene, and there were only a few boxes along with a chair and chain. Volnus however was well dressed in a waistcoat and shirt with formal trousers and shoes. Now this isn't the conventional psychopath, who would usually be dressed in ripped, bloody clothes or some shabby apparel. Either this, or a costume that is used as a disguise.Friday, 27 March 2015
Evaluation - Question 7
Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
As we were learning about these new rules, we therefore ensured that these techniques were present in our preliminary exercises to show that we could use them effectively and without too much inconvenience. During this exercise, I felt comfortable with using the 180-degree rule, as well as shot-reverse-shot. These were simple to go about as we simply established our 180-degree line of action by not allowing the camera to move beyond the legs of the chairs. Shot-reverse-shot was accomplished by simply shooting from over the shoulders of the two speakers; recording the conversation once from both ends. However, successfully adhering to match-on-action proved more difficult than we had expected. For example, we filmed the male actor opening the door with the handle in one shot, but in the shot we attempted to match it to, he opened it with his hand. Thanks to some some clever editing though, we managed to hide this technical error. However, we were able to learn from this mistake, and therefore when shooting the real film, we made sure we shot each shot several times from different angles and in different ways in order to minimise the possibility of error as much as possible.
Following the completion of our preliminary task, I felt as though I had come away more knowledgeable. I now knew how to operate the camera effectively, and how to achieve several different types of shots such as close-ups, high-angle, over shoulder shots and many more. All of this was achieved while remaining to comply with the basic rules of film-making.
Shot-Reverse-Shot: Being able to successfully accomplish this would inevitably proved a challenge for us, given that in the first scene, Volnus' face is deliberately obscured, and in the second scene, only one actor is present. However, it does still occur in some sense when Frank tells Volnus to "go to hell", and the camera switches back to Volnus' point-of-view (seen below).

Although, a true shot-reverse-shot does not occur in this opening two minutes, it would certainly have occurred in the rest of the film, and we would have been capable of doing so. It is merely the context of the opening two scenes that prevented us from explicitly using one. We wanted Volnus' true identity to remain a mystery for now, so we avoided using a true shot-reverse-shot in order to achieve this.
Match-On-Action: As mentioned previously, we had some issues with this in our preliminary task, so to resolve this, we shot each shot several times from several angles in several different ways, and then took the best. I believe that this technique was successful as all of our shots seem to flow without technical error. This therefore contributes to the film's verisimilitude, and makes it a greater film as a result.
180 Degree Rule: This, although perhaps not entirely noticeable, was indeed present in our film. We drew our imaginary line in the same way we had in the preliminary exercise: the camera must never go beyond the legs of the chair; i.e. - the camera must never be placed anywhere behind Frank. When filming, we successfully obeyed this rule with each shot (with the exception of Volnus' point-of-view shot that broke the rule intentionally for an eerie effect). As a result of this success, our film maintains its continuity, and is a superior film than it would otherwise have been as a result. Had we not had practise in our preliminary exercise, then I believe it would have been far more difficult for our film to maintain continuity and verisimilitude, and so our preliminary exercise doubtlessly contributed to the film's overall realistic merits.
I think that the preliminary exercise gave use a taste of the skills required for film-making, and gave us a basic understanding of how to use the camera to accomplish different shots and techniques, while still complying with the laws of continuity. By using these techniques individually, we were able to assess what we were capable of doing and what required improvement. It therefore made sense target our weaknesses as this would develop our skills as film-makers. Hence, by developing these skills, I feel as though my skills have massively improved from when we began. I now feel far more confident in using a camera for a variety of different shots and techniques, as well as using Final Cut Express to edit the film post-production to maximise continuity. I feel far more accustomed to all aspects of film-making, and feel as though I have come away far more knowledgeable. Now equipped with this vaster span of knowledge, I feel as though I have definitely opened opportunities for film-making and editing in the future; far more than I could have ever done previously. This has certainly been a fantastic experience for me.Thursday, 26 March 2015
Wednesday, 25 March 2015
Evaluation - Question 4
The audio clip on the final slide may not work properly, so here is the link to its source
https://www.freesound.org/people/isteak/sounds/238251/
https://www.freesound.org/people/isteak/sounds/238251/
Tuesday, 24 March 2015
Monday, 23 March 2015
Sunday, 22 March 2015
Sunday, 15 February 2015
On set
On Wednesday the 11th of February, we took to the stage in an 'amazing' performance to film the main chunk of our film. We brought in the props and costume we needed as well as the make-up. We decided not much make-up was needed due to the darkness of the set so only did a large bruise around Ross' right eye and a few cuts on his arm with a red fine liner.
Character Make-up
Tuesday, 10 February 2015
Monday, 9 February 2015
Radio Report Script
RADIO REPORTER
...and in other news, there are still no updates on the disappearance of 25 year old Frank Morris: a local police inspector who went missing on his way home from work on the 5th of March, with no reports of sightings since. With this being the 5th disappearance within the last 2 months, the possibility of foul play is beginning to loom, and as a result, baffled police are urging for anyone with information to come forward as quickly as possible before the case worsens. A cash reward of up to £500 is being issued for any information leading to Frank. Police have also expressed their concern of the possibility of a kidnapping and advise citizens to be wary, since there remains a likelihood of more disappearances to come.
Final Script
Opening sequence
A near-completely dark room is lit by a single key light, lighting the young male victim's (Inspector Frank Morris) face who is chained to a chair. The camera cuts to a tall man in a suit (Volnus) walking through the room. With every step the man makes, a loud footstep resonates. He stands in front of Frank, twirling a knife in his hand. A muffled voice is heard, altered with a voice changer to be deeper.
VOLNUS
"Hello Inspector. It's good to finally have you here."
The man begins to slowly walk around the chair, seemingly inspecting the young male. His face is concealed by the darkness, but the rest of his body is revealed; a suit/formal wear. He stops behind Frank and crouches so that his head is next to Frank's.
VOLNUS
"Now, who should we call?"
The man slowly browses through the contacts on the Inspector's phone. An eyeline match to the phone shows the name 'Will' on the screen. Will being the protagonist. He then dials the number on speaker.
VOLNUS
"I'm sure that your 'Will' would like to get involved."
The camera then cuts to the Will in another room, waiting a few seconds and then getting an incoming call on his phone.
WILL
"Hey Frank, it's been a while. How're you?"
VOLNUS
"Hello, Will. Your friend seems to be in a spot of trouble." *small pause* "Right Frankie boy?"
FRANK
"Go to hell!"
The phone cuts off with the dial tone sound. The camera cuts to the Will, who looks at his phone in confusion. It then cuts back to Volnus who places the phone in his pocket and stands up, once again twirling the knife in his hand.
VOLNUS
"Well then. I guess I'll see you there, Frank!"
The camera shows Volnus lunging towards Frank with the knife and shows a shot of Frank's shadow being penetrated by the shadow of the knife. There is then a cut to static. The title sequence is then initiated
After the title sequence, there is a montage of Will getting ready then walking downstairs to the sound of a radio report describing Frank's sudden disappearance.
Tuesday, 3 February 2015
Monday, 12 January 2015
Looking for props
While looking for props to use for our film, these are the links to the ones that we may use;
- http://www.amazon.com/Seasons-13398-Realistic-Knife/dp/B003IBX3Z2
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Halloween-Movie-Michael-Myers-Knife-Toy-Weapon-Bloody-Halloween-Prop-/131308480533
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Smiffys-Bloody-Screamer-Knife-Prank-Prop-Fancy-Dress-Costume-Halloween-BN-/281528415135
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Halloween-Bleeding-Bloody-Knife-Blood-Fake-Trick-or-Treat-Fancy-Dress-/400800174171?pt=Adult_Fancy_Dress_UK&hash=item5d518d505b
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Novelty-Joke-Trick-Dagger-Fake-Knife-Retractable-Blade-Fancy-Dress-Disappearing-/281432348365?pt=Adult_Fancy_Dress_UK&hash=item4186acd6cd
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/SEVERED-ARM-AND-TWO-FAKE-KNIVES-HALLOWEEN-NEW-/231450164910?pt=UK_Health_Beauty_Make_Up_Cosmetics_Foundation_PP&hash=item35e3813eae
- http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Fake-Plastic-Knife-Butchers-Cleaver-with-Skull-Handle-Halloween-Prop-Accessory-/201182409790?pt=UK_Clothing_Masks_JD&hash=item2ed767f43e
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)























